• The Military Veteran’s Transition to a Leadership Culture in which Obedience is a Bad Word

    Download PDF
    Please note...
    This site welcomes a variety of viewpoints and perspectives on community engagement. Ideas shared here should not be considered as being endorsed by the UNC School of Government in any way as the School is nonpartisan and policy-neutral.

    Obedience is part of military culture, both as a legal obligation and as an instilled reflexive practice deemed essential to survival in combat. Circumstances might require following orders that go against natural instincts.

    Military training also encourages initiative and independent thought, and, when appropriate, expressing concerns about decisions or a state of affairs. But it also involves understanding that when a decision has been made you must do everything you can to implement it and influence others to act in the same way.

    Contrary to what many without military experience may assume, the military teaches leaders not to rely on obedience, and training does not equate the wielding of authority with leadership. All of the branches define leadership essentially as influencing others by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission. They teach that leadership always must be adapted to the circumstances.

    The need to adapt is certainly true for veterans who take on leadership responsibilities in civil organizations. They need to keep in mind that public service organizations usually do not share the military’s culture of formal authority. Veterans can be surprised by how much depends on voluntary cooperation rather than adherence to a chain of command. The word “obedience” is not uttered except derisively.

    Military leadership training gives developmental experience of this adaptive nature. It involves being assigned responsibilities for peers and supervising their performance. Peers likely will not respond well to an authoritarian approach. Success depends on building mutually supportive relationships. Those who were unable to gain the trust of their peers may not have support when they most need it and it cannot be compelled.

    In organizations in which appeals to authority are unlikely to be welcomed, leaders with military experience must be attuned to all the principles they were taught for effective leadership, especially the importance of integrity, communicating a compelling mission, and setting an example of commitment to that mission. Failure to be vigilant about important differences in organizational climate can have unfortunate consequences for both a transitioning leader and the organization. Individuals may speak out, ignore direction, or even act contrary to it. Harmful stereotypes about the military may be reinforced, causing other members of the organization to discount the leader’s ability as tied too much to a hierarchical and authoritarian culture. This can cause long-term damage to the leader’s standing within the organization and even impede openness to veteran hiring or collaboration.

    Successful military leaders usually recall rarely having to wield the formal authority with which they were entrusted. They developed relationships within their units based on trust and respect and a unified commitment to mission accomplishment. Though the paths to developing these relationships and commitments may look different, the successful result looks very much the same.


    Click here for Szypszak’s recent discussion of Learning from Military Leadership, published in PA Times.  

    Charles Szypszak
    Guest Blogger
    Charles Szypszak teaches Law for Public Administration and Military Leadership and Public Administration in the School of Government’s graduate program and provides counsel to public officials. He served as a captain in the US Marine Corps. He is author of the book soon forthcoming from McFarland Publishing, "Military Leadership Lessons for Public Service." He may be contacted at szypszak@sog.unc.edu.

    3 thoughts on “The Military Veteran’s Transition to a Leadership Culture in which Obedience is a Bad Word”

    • Larry Keeton Colonel (Retired) US Army says:

      Your comments are spot on.
      Any veteran with military leadership training and experience is an asset to a public, nonprofit, or private sector job. Few organizations train their leaders to the degree the military does. As such, many public, nonprofit, and private sector supervisors and managers lack the skill sets to develop high performing teams. An April 2015 Gallup Poll on leadership engagement found that only 35% of the managers were engaged, while 51% were not engaged, and an additional 14% actively disengaged. Military leaders know how to be engaged, how to develop teams as you say, etc. But, military leaders also bring a skill set in developing options and solutions. The public sector needs more military leaders leading it if we’re to escape what Professor Donald Kettl calls Jurassic Government.

    • Charles Szypszak says:

      Thank you for your thoughtful comment and your service, Colonel Keeton. Furthermore, the basic leadership principles taught and learned in the military are adaptable to all public service contexts, contrary to the popular misimpression. Being mindful of them can better equip anyone for the challenges.

    • John Mark Wilson says:

      Great post, Professor Szypszak! When I was a battalion commander, I spent many hours talking transitions with my junior officers and senior NCOs. My sense was that those personnel with adaptive personalities and leadership styles had the smoothest transitions. As such, I tried to encourage young leaders in my formation to develop life habits that broadened their frames of reference. For example, during counseling I would ask what books they were thinking of reading over the next year. I tried to encourage a diverse reading list to broaden their perspectives. I also made it clear that I would authorize passes for leaders to pursue self-development opportunities (e.g. go to the Hill to listen to committee hearings or to meet with members of non-military agencies to discuss national common security challenges). When I get back to a real unit and we both have some free time, I would love to bring you over to talk to my troops about your research and book. I think our transition programs would be well served to consider your points as well.

    • Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

^ Back to Top